Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 147014

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : ZC10 - ZC15 Full Version

Determination of the Impact of Various Commonly Consumed Beverages on the Colour Stability of Universal Nanohybrid, Nanofilled, and Microhybrid Composite Resins: An In-vitro Spectrophotometric Study


Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64563.18705
Shreya Modi, Chintan Joshi, Mona Somani, Aashray Patel, Anisha Parmar, Kruti Jadawala

1. Postgraduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. 5. Postgraduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. 6. Postgraduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Shreya Modi,
Postgraduate, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar-382422, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: shreyahm2210@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The challenge in restorative dentistry is related to changes in the colour of composite over time when exposed to a variety of common beverages, which necessitates additional expenses for the patients.

Aim: To compare the colour changes of various composites currently available on the market after exposure to commonly consumed beverages.

Materials and Methods: This in-vitro study was conducted from May 2022 to December 2022 in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics at Karnavati School of Dentistry in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. A total of 120 disc-shaped composite pellets, with 40 specimens for each type of composite (nanohybrid, nanofilled, and microhybrid), measuring 6×2 mm, were prepared and divided into four subgroups based on the beverages used (Distilled water, coca-cola, Tea, and Coffee). The samples were submerged in the respective beverages and kept at 37°C for seven days. Colour assessment was performed using a spectrophotometer before and after immersion. The obtained Commission International de l Eclairage (CIE) ?E values were recorded after measuring the CIE L*a*b* values. Data analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0, utilising a paired t-test, post hoc Tukey’s test, and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). A significance level of p<0.05 was used.

Results: Among all the beverages, the nanofilled composite showed the highest mean colour change, while the nanohybrid composite exhibited the lowest. Overall, the greatest colour change was observed with tea, followed by coffee, coca-cola, and the least with distilled water. In tea, coffee, and coca-cola, the nanohybrid composite and nanofilled composite showed a statistically significant difference in mean colour change: 16.74 (p<0.001), -7.29 (p<0.001), and -1.02 (p=0.018), respectively. However, the difference between the nanohybrid and microhybrid composite was statistically insignificant.

Conclusion: The nanohybrid composite demonstrated the least mean colour change, followed by the microhybrid composite, while the nanofilled composite exhibited the highest colour change.

Keywords

Aesthetic, Blending, Colour matching, Optical properties, Storage media, Staining

The demand for long-lasting restorations that are both functional and aesthetically beautiful has increased among patients as a result of societal economic changes and media influences. However, one of the main issues contributing to clinical failure of restorative materials is discolouration. Several intrinsic and extrinsic conditions can cause composite resin to become discoloured. Intrinsic factors such as the composite resin matrix and its solubility, filler type and amount, degradation of resin-filler bond, and incomplete polymerisation affect the colour stability of composite restorations. Extrinsic influences include the patient’s hygiene practices, smoking habits, eating habits, chemical reactions, surface roughness, and absorption of colourants from external sources (1). The nature, type, and quantity of the polymeric matrix material, as well as the size and distribution of the filler particles, have an impact on the surface changes of composites (2).

Studies have shown that coloured solutions like tea, coffee, and other beverages can cause discolouration of composite restorative materials (3),(4),(5). According to the Tea Board of India, tea consumption accounts for 80% of its domestic production (5). With a stronger brew, the staining chemicals in tea, such as tannins, aflavins, and anthocyanins, may become even more concentrated (4). The younger generation consumes more carbonated drinks like coca-cola, with India being the third-largest consumer worldwide (5). Recent research has shown that acidic liquids like soft drinks (orange juice and cola) can cause erosion of resin composites. These surface abrasions can affect the gloss, which may subsequently worsen extrinsic stains (6). Immersion in coffee is considered an acceptable test procedure to determine the susceptibility of resin-based materials to discolouration due to its strong staining potential (7),(8).

Recently, NeoSpectra™ST (DentsplyDeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) is a nanohybrid universal resin composite made with SphereTEC technology. The company claims that manufacturing microscaled, spherical prepolymerised fillers’ shape and size distribution enhance chameleon blending ability with excellent stain-resistant lustre (9). FiltekZ350XT (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) is a nanofilled composite. The true nanotechnology provides superior wear resistance and gloss retention. According to the manufacturer, it has better polish retention and improved fluorescence (10). Polofil Supra (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) is a microhybrid composite based on the proven VOCO sintra glass multifiller system. It has superb aesthetics and outstanding physical properties (11).

Extensive research has been conducted on the colour stability of dental composites. Numerous studies have investigated the effects of composition alterations, filler changes, and the impact of various beverages, among other factors (2),(8),(11). Thermal stress and water sorption can lead to expansion, surface deterioration, and microcracking, which can allow colourants to permeate (11). Extrinsic discolouration is the main factor affecting colour stability, emphasising the need for dental researchers and material scientists to develop new resin-based materials for aesthetic restorations that are more resistant to discolouration (1). Very few studies (9),(12) have compared the colour stability of the recently marketed nanohybrid composite in commonly consumed beverages.

Therefore, the aim of the proposed study was to evaluate the colour stability of the universal nanohybrid composite, along with previously tested nanofilled and microhybrid composites, when submerged in the most popularly consumed beverages.

Material and Methods

An in-vitro study was conducted from May 2022 to December 2022, at the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

Sample size calculation: The study considered information from a prior study (1) on the evaluation of colour stability of three composite resins in mouthwash. Based on this, a sample size of 10 discs per group was used in the current investigation to achieve data with 95% power and 5% significance using statistical power analysis.

Study Procedure

The proposed study followed a 3×4 factorial design, including three groups and four subgroups, to assess two variables: resin-based composites. Group 1 consisted of NeoSpectra™ ST (Shade A2), Group 2 included FiltekZ350XT (Shade A2E), and Group 3 consisted of Polofil Supra (shade A2) (Table/Fig 1). The staining conditions included Distilled water (Das Enterprise, Ahmedabad, India), coca-cola (PepsiCo India private limited, Gurugram, India), Tata tea premium (Tata Consumer Products, Maharashtra, India), and Nescafe coffee (Nestle, Maharashtra, India) (Table/Fig 2).

Acrylic moulds with a thickness of (2±0.1 mm) and an interior diameter of (6.0±0.1 mm) were used to create a total of 120 disc-shaped specimens, with 40 specimens for each composite (Table/Fig 3). To minimise oxygen exposure, the resin composite was carefully packed into the moulds and coated with a Mylar sheet. A glass slide was placed on top to extrude any excess composite and achieve a smooth surface while avoiding the creation of bubbles. Pressure was applied for 30 seconds (1),(9),(10). Polymerisation was performed using a BlueShot (BS) (Shofu, Kyoto, Japan) light curing unit with a light intensity of 1200 wM/cm2 for 30 seconds. The tip of the curing light was brought into contact with the glass slide to standardise the distance between the light and the specimen. The light was positioned perpendicular to the specimen surface to deliver a homogeneous light beam with minimum light attenuation (13),(14).

After curing, the specimens were removed from the moulds. The samples were then polished following the manufacturer’s instructions using four different abrasive discs (SHOFU Super-Snap Rainbow Technique Kit, Kyoto, Japan). These discs were mounted in a slow-speed handpiece. During the polishing procedures, the specimens were firmly set inside an acrylic mould. The specimens were then immersed in an ultrasonic device for 15 minutes to remove remnants from the polishing procedure. The final thickness of the discs was determined using a vernier calliper (Global Delivery Centres, Hoshiarpur, India) (Table/Fig 4). All specimens were stored for 24 hours at 37°C in distilled water to ensure adequate rehydration and polymerisation. The initial colour values of all samples were assessed using the Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage L*a*b* (CIELAB) system (1),(15) with Vita Easyshade (Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) (Table/Fig 5). Before each specimen measurement, calibration was performed by placing the probe tip on the machine’s built-in calibration port (one calibration standard). The mean values of L0*, a0*, and b0* were recorded after each measurement was carried out three times. L* represents lightness, a* represents the degree of redness or greenness, and b* represents the degree of yellowness or blueness (16),(17).

These 40 samples of each composite were then immersed in four different beverages (10 specimens each) for seven days at 37°C.

Staining conditions: For the Coffee beverage, 2 g of coffee and 236.6 mL of boiling water were combined. Since a cup of coffee typically takes 15 minutes to drink and 2 to 3 cups are usually consumed daily, the samples were submerged in coffee for seven days at 37°C. Thus, the 7-day immersion period in the proposed study was equivalent to 7.4 months of clinical coffee consumption and its effects on composite restorations (18). Tea solutions were prepared by dissolving 4 g of measured tea in 300 mL of hot water for 10 minutes (19). Samples were submerged in the tea solution for seven days at 37°C after the tea solution had cooled for five minutes. Samples were also stored in coca-cola at 37°C for seven days (Table/Fig 6).

Spectrophotometric analysis: After a week, the samples were removed, cleaned with distilled water for five minutes, and dried on blotting paper. The same spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) was used to measure the secondary colours.

The colour difference (?E) between the two values obtained values was calculated using the following formula:

?E={(L1*-L0*) 2+(a1*-a0*) 2+(b1*-b0*)2}1/2 (15).

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, data were compiled in an Excel spreadsheet, and SPSS (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to determine the means and standard deviations. One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was conducted for numerical data to evaluate the means of three or more groups of samples, using the F distribution. To determine which of the three groups was significantly different from the others, a posthoc Tukey test was employed. A paired t-test was conducted to assess differences in mean between the various groups. Statistical significance was considered at p<0.05.

Results

After immersion, colour changes were observed in all the samples. The highest mean colour change was seen with tea, followed by coffee, coca-cola, and distilled water, with values of 25.14±4.44, 16.50±3.95, 2.94±0.36, and 2.82±1.35, respectively (Table/Fig 7).

When comparing the two composite groups, the nanofilled composite (FiltekZ350XT) showed the highest mean colour change value across all beverages, while the nanohybrid composite (NeoSpectra™ST) showed the least. The nanofilled composite (FiltekZ350XT) exhibited the highest colour change in tea (25.14±4.44), while the least colour change was seen with the nanohybrid composite (NeoSpectra™ST) in distilled water (1.81±1.02) (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8) and (Table/Fig 9) for the one-way ANOVA test, which demonstrates that the groups differ significantly from each other.

When comparing the NeoSpectra™ST and FiltekZ350XT groups, there was a statistically significant mean difference in coca-cola, tea, and coffee, with values of -1.02 (p=0.018), -16.74 (p<0.001), and -7.29 (p<0.001), respectively (Table/Fig 10). However, when comparing the NeoSpectra™ST and Polofil Supra groups, no statistically significant difference was found in any of the beverages (Table/Fig 10).

Except for the comparison between distilled water and coca-cola, all three composite groups showed statistically significant differences in colour change comparisons between all four beverages.

The comparison between distilled water and coca-cola did not show any statistically significant difference in any of the three composite groups (nanohybrid, nanofilled, and microhybrid), with values of 0.999, 1, and 0.836, respectively (Table/Fig 11). The p-values for the nanohybrid and microhybrid composites were 0.703 and 0.797, respectively, indicating that there was no statistically significant difference between tea and coffee in terms of colour change (Table/Fig 11).

Discussion

Insufficient light intensity and exposure time can result in incomplete polymerisation of composites, which can contribute to early colour changes due to water absorption and solubility (20). In the proposed study, the polymerisation times of all specimens were adequate and comparable to ensure proper polymerisation.

When composites are cured against a Mylar strip, a resin-rich surface is formed initially, which is then finished to create a filler-rich surface with higher Knoop hardness values and reduced chemical solubility (21). Therefore, in the proposed study, all specimens were finished consistently to achieve a uniform surface.

Colour is a subjective phenomenon that can vary between individuals and even within the same person over time. To minimise subjective inaccuracies, the Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (CIE) L*a*b* colour scheme, spectrophotometers, and colourimeters were used to measure colour shifts (22). Spectrophotometers, with their ability to measure reflectance curves at narrow intervals, provide more precise colour measurements compared to colourimeters (23). Hence, spectrophotometers were used in this experiment.

In the proposed study, the specimens were immersed in different liquids for seven days. It has been shown that exposing dental materials to staining solutions for a short period, such as seven days, can lead to material discolouration (24). According to Chan et al., stain penetration can reach up to five microns, and the majority of staining occurs within the first week (25).

A colour difference (?E) value between 1 to 3 is perceptible, and a value of 3.7 or higher is considered clinically unacceptable (26). In the proposed study, both tea and coffee showed clinically unacceptable colour changes, while distilled water and coca-cola showed clinically acceptable colour changes. Furthermore, the samples exposed to tea exhibited the greatest overall colour change, followed by samples exposed to coffee and coca-cola.

Factors such as the type of drink, pigment amount, and pH level are known to contribute to colour to varying degrees (27). Both tea and coffee contain distinct yellow colourants with different polarities. Coffee, with its lower polarity components, elutes later, while tea, with its higher polarity components, elutes earlier (5). Additionally, both tea and coffee contain water, which has the potential to damage polymer materials. When polymer materials absorb water, hydrolysis can occur, leading to the breakage of chemical bonds between filler particles and the resin matrix. This can result in filler particles detaching from the material’s surface, causing surface roughness and ultimately leading to discolouration (28).

In the proposed study, coca-cola caused a modest colour change, which may be attributed to the change in sample roughness caused by the low pH of the solution, facilitating the adsorption of colour onto the surface. These findings support Patel et al., claim that coca-cola only slightly alters the colour of composite resins (29). Mundim FM et al., also reported that coca-cola was ineffective in causing colour changes in composite resins (30).

The surface roughness of restorative materials is influenced by the amount and size of filler particles, which in turn is related to the external colour (31). Various factors related to filler components, such as interparticle spacing, filler distribution, quality of filler bond to the matrix, and presence of filler agglomeration and clusters, affect the surface characteristics of the composite (32). According to Ikejima I et al., the amount of inorganic content in composite resins increases their mechanical properties, and the structural arrangement of fillers plays a crucial role in this regard (33). The filler percentages reported by the manufacturers for the composite resins examined in the proposed study are as follows: NeoSpectra™ST contains 78-80 wt% filler load, FiltekZ350XT has 76.5 wt%, and Polofil Supra incorporates 76.5 wt% (Table/Fig 1).

In the present study, FiltekZ350XT exhibited the highest colour change in all beverages. Additionally, there was a statistically significant mean difference in colour change between the NeoSpectra™ST and FiltekZ350XT groups in coca-cola, coffee, and tea. These differences between composites may be attributed to the smaller quantity and larger size of filler particles in FiltekZ350XT, which can result in higher surface roughness and increased discolouration. Nasim I et al., suggested that the porosity of the silica fillers and the porosity of aggregated filler particles in FiltekZ350XT may contribute to this effect (34).

On the other hand, NeoSpectra™ST showed the least mean colour change in all four beverages compared to the other composites. The could be attributed to the use of SphereTEC™ technology in manufacturing this material. The spherical prepolymerised fillers with their microgranulated structure provide excellent adaptability and sculptability, and they can bind more free resin compared to regular fillers. Additionally, the higher weight percentage of fillers in NeoSpectra™ST results in less material deterioration in different beverages. Restorations appear optically smooth if the surface roughness is less than 1 μm (35). A recent study by Gurgan S et al., demonstrated that NeoSpectra™ST has acceptable roughness values for clinical efficacy, and a similar result can be observed for the mean colour change of the composite (9).

Microhybrid composites, such as Polofil Supra, contain filler particles of various sizes and distributions. These composites typically have a weight percentage of 77% microfillers ranging in size from 0.05 μm. The stability of the glass framework in these composites is crucial. On the other hand, nanofilled composites, like FiltekZ350XT, contain nanoclusters, which are aggregates of particles. These particles have higher water absorption capacities and are less resistant to discolouration compared to the sintraglass multifillers and macro/micron-sized fillers in microhybrid composites (36). These research findings support the results of the current study, indicating that microhybrid composites have greater colour stability than nanofilled composites.

Finally, it is important to acknowledge that the oral cavity is a complex environment with various factors at play. Factors such as consumed foods, beverages, their temperature, salivary substances, and clinical circumstances can all influence the physical and aesthetic properties of composite materials.

Limitation(s)

The evaluation of colour stability in in-vitro experiments has inherent limitations. In order to predict the behaviour of materials in a clinical setting, authors tried to simulate the effects of long-term exposure over a shorter period of time in the present study. However, it is important to note that the effects of heat from hot food and drinks, saliva, and other fluids may be more pronounced in the oral cavity. Furthermore, the process of mastication can alter the surface roughness of the resin, allowing deposits and discolouring agents to adhere more strongly to rough surfaces. Additionally, there is intermittent interaction between dental structures, restorative materials, and staining agents, which can be exacerbated by mechanical wear.

Conclusion

Overall, the results of this investigation demonstrated that all composite resins were susceptible to colour changes when exposed to various beverages. The nanohybrid composite showed higher colour stability, followed by the microhybrid composite, and the least stability was observed in the nanofilled composite. Among the beverages tested, tea caused the highest colour change, followed by coffee, coca-cola, and the least change was seen with distilled water. Based on these findings, it is not recommended to consume tea, coffee, or coca-cola immediately following composite repair.

The clinical significance of these findings is as follows:

1. Patients should be under dental supervision to minimise the negative effects of coffee and tea consumption on the aesthetic quality of restorations.
2. It is important to select the most appropriate restorative material for each clinical intervention and to use it in a manner that maximises its desirable qualities. Understanding the composition of the restorative material is crucial in this regard.

References

1.
Shree Roja RJ, Sriman N, Prabhakar V, Minu K, Subha A, Ambalavanan P. Comparative evaluation of colour stability of three composite resins in mouthrinse: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(2):175-80. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Shetty P, Purayil TP, Ginjupalli K, Pentapati KC. Effect of polishing technique and immersion in beverages on colour stability of nanoceramic composites. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021;11(1):53-56. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Elsaka S, Taibah S, Elnaghy A. Effect of staining beverages and bleaching on optical properties of a CAD/CAM nanohybrid and nanoceramic restorative material. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):96. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Patil A, Muliya VS, Pentapati KC, Kamath S. Effect of green, tulsi, and areca teas on the colour stability of two composite resin materials-an in-vitro spectrophotometric analysis. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:423-28.[crossref][PubMed]
5.
Chowdhury D, Mazumdar P, Desai P, Datta P. Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and colour stability of nanohybrid composite resin after periodic exposure to tea, coffee, and Coca-cola-An in-vitro profilometric and image analysis study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(4):395-401. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Ceci M, Viola M, Rattalino D, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Poggio C. Discolouration of different esthetic restorative materials: A spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(2):149-56. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Malek Afzali B, Ghasemi A, Mirani A, Abdolazimi Z, Akbarzade Baghban A, Kharazifard MJ. Effect of ingested liquids on colour change of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran). 2015;12(8):577-84.
8.
Lauvahutanon S, Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Oki M, Finger WJ, et al. Discolouration of various CAD/CAM blocks after immersion in coffee. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42(1):09-18. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gurgan S, Koc Vural U, Miletic I. Comparison of mechanical and optical properties of a newly marketed universal composite resin with contemporary universal composite resins: An in-vitro study. Microsc Res Tech. 2022;85(3):1171-79. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Backes CN, FranÇa FMG, Turssi CP, Amarl FLB, Basting RT. Colour stability of a bulk-fill composite resin light-cured at different distances. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e119. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Nasoohi N, Hoorizad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14(2):69-75.
12.
Yas¸ in B, Bakir S¸ . Effect of additional polymerization process on colour change in composite resins hold in different solutions. Journal of Dental Sciences and Education. 2023;28:41-48. [crossref]
13.
Konerding KL, Heyder M, Kranz S, Guellmar A, Voelpel A, Watts DC, et al. Study of energy transfer by different light curing units into a class III restoration as a function of tilt angle and distance, using a MARC Patient Simulator (PS). Dent Mater. 2016;32(5):676-86. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Diab RA, Yap AU, Gonzalez MAG, Yahya NA. Impact of light-curing distance on the effectiveness of cure of bulk-fill resin-based composites. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(8):1184-89. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Hafez R, Ahmed D, Yousry M, El-Badrawy W, El-Mowafy O. Effect of in-office bleaching on colour and surface roughness of composite restoratives. Eur J Dent. 2010;4(2):118-27. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of colour matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int. 1991;22(7):525-31.
17.
Karaarslan ES, Bulbul M, Ertas E, Cebe MA, Usumez A. Assessment of changes in colour and colour parameters of light-cured composite resin after alternative polymerization methods. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(1):110-16. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Garoushi S, Lassila L, Hatem M, Shembesh M, Baady L, Salim Z, et al. Influence of staining solutions and whitening procedures on discolouration of hybrid composite resins. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(1):144-50. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Emami Arjomand M, Hoorizad Ganjkar M, Ghamari R. Effect of tea on colour stability of enamel lesions treated with resin infiltrant. Front Dent. 2021;18:4. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Unsal KA, Karaman E. Effect of additional light curing on colour stability of composite resins. Int Dent J. 2022;72(3):346-52. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Kocaagaoglu H, Aslan T, Gürbulak A, Albayrak H, Tas¸ demir Z, Gumus H. Efficacy of polishing kits on the surface roughness and colour stability of different composite resins. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(5):557-65. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Garg SA, Chavda SM. Colour masking white fluorotic spots by resin infiltration and its quantitation by computerized photographic analysis: A 12-month follow-up study. Oper Dent. 2020;45(1):01-09. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Chittem J, Sajjan GS, Varma Kanumuri M. Spectrophotometric evaluation of colour stability of nano hybrid composite resin in commonly used food colourants in Asian countries. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(1):ZC61-ZC65. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Barakah HM, Taher NM. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(3):625-31. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43(5):542-45. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Barry TN, Bailey CW, Ashcraft-Olmscheid D, Vandewalle KS. Effect of a new bleaching gel on tooth whitening. Oper Dent. 2017;42(5):559-66. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Ozkanoglu S, G Akin EG. Evaluation of the effect of various beverages on the colour stability and microhardness of restorative materials. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(3):322-28. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Siriporananon C, Ornprasert N, Mettasitthikorn W, Likhitpreeda S, et al. The effect of different beverages on surface hardness of nanohybrid resin composite and giomer. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(3):261-65. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(5):587-94; quiz 654. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Mundim FM, Garcia Lda F, Pires-de-Souza Fde C. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(3):249-54. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Ferooz M, Bagheri R, Jafarpour D, Burrow MF. Physical properties of nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites subjected to an acidic environment: A laboratory study. Oper Dent. 2020;45(3):E105-13. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Kyoizumi H, Yamada J, Suzuki T, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Sasaki K. Effects of toothbrush hardness on in-vitro wear and roughness of composite resins. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(6):1137-44. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent Mater. 2003;19(3):206-11. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Colour stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins-an in-vitro study. J Dent. 2010;38(Suppl 2):e137-42. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater. 1994;10(5):325-30. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Meshki R, Rashidi M. Effect of natural and commercially produced juices on colour stability of microhybrid and nanohybrid composites. BDJ Open. 2022;8(1):11.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64563.18705

Date of Submission: Apr 07, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 17, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Aug 28, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for the present study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 14, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 05, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 25, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com